Re: Issue 3918: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

[David Kastrup]

Paul Morris <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote
>> "replace" is a bit too generic in my opinion.  I rather like the flair
>> of \behold.  \substitute does not seem all that bad either, however.
>
> \behold does have flair, but I think it wouldn't really convey what we'd
> want.  (i.e. pointing out what's already there or revealing something hidden
> (like James' \et_voila!), rather than making a change.)
>
> Anyway, I thought of another one: \swap
>
> ...to stick with four-letter words like \hide and \omit. 

No, the implication of "swap" is an exchange rather than a replacement.
Overriding with a specific stencil is going to be verbose anyway.  How
about "\adorn"?

-- 
David Kastrup