[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docs: state that LilyPond input is in terms of pitches (issue 185140
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Docs: state that LilyPond input is in terms of pitches (issue 185140043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:18:08 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/185140043/diff/20001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/185140043/diff/20001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode119
Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:119: @node Pitches
On 2014/12/09 07:52:26, J_lowe wrote:
Problem with calling this node 'Pitches' is that it throws an error as
it has
been previously defined in another @node in this doc. You'll need to
change it.
It's also not what this is about. It's more like "black keys"
informally. Formally possibly "The chromatic scale". But that sounds
more like composition theory than note names. So "Pitch alterations"
might work better.
https://codereview.appspot.com/185140043/