[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hid
From: |
trueroad |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:16:29 +0000 |
I've updated the patch.
https://codereview.appspot.com/262330043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/text.itely
File Documentation/notation/text.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/262330043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/text.itely#newcode1547
Documentation/notation/text.itely:1547: If first font family in the list
exists, it is used basically.
On 2015/09/07 14:34:48, pkx wrote:
@var{font-name} can be described using a comma-separate list for font
@q{families} and a white-space separated list for font @q{styles}. As
long as
the @q{family} in the list is installed it will be used, otherwise the
@emph{next} font in the list will be used instead.
Thank you.
Because the font is selected from the list for each glyph, I've changed
a little.
https://codereview.appspot.com/262330043/
- Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), pkx, 2015/09/07
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden),
trueroad <=
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2015/09/07
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/09/07
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2015/09/07
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), trueroad, 2015/09/08
- Re: Issue 4591: Fix font-name overriding (issue 262330043 by address@hidden), trueroad, 2015/09/10