[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false]
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false] |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:40:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> 2016-01-12 0:22 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> 2016-01-11 23:14 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>>>> Btw, it wasn't entirely clear to me that guilev2.x changes essential
>>>>> stuff that often.
>>>>> Exactly which guile-version are we aiming for?
>>>>
>>>> The non-existing 2.0.12. Currently, the stable-2.0 branch. The main
>>>> challenge currently seems to be compiling LilyPond with a Guile version
>>>> that is not installed on your system.
>>>
>>> To be sure, the exercise is:
>>>
>>> (1) checkout the marked branch
>>>
>>> ~/guile (master)$ git branch -a
>>> * master
>> [...]
>>> remotes/origin/stable-2.0
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> [...]
>>
>>> (2) Compile it
>>> (3) Build LilyPond with this guile somehow
>>>
>>> Correct?
>>
>> It's the basis for making more tangible progress. [...]
>
> I've now checked out branch origin/stable-2.0, derived a local branch
> and compiled it.
>
> ~/guile/meta (my-stable-2.0)$ ./guile
> GNU Guile 2.0.11.170-4d08e
> [...]
>
> Should be the version we aim at.
>
> Though, how to compile LilyPond with this guile-version?
> Which commands do you actually use for it?
That question is easy to answer: I never built with anything but the
Ubuntu Guile versions. So this would appear to be of the "look at what
options "./configure --help" offers for this" kind. And if it's silent
about that, see what kind of environment variables might be interpreted.
I mean, Gub has to do the same here: build its own library version and
use/link it. So there must be a way.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], (continued)
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], Thomas Morley, 2016/01/10
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/10
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/10
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], Thomas Morley, 2016/01/11
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/11
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], Thomas Morley, 2016/01/11
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/11
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/11
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], Thomas Morley, 2016/01/16
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false],
David Kastrup <=
- Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], Thomas Morley, 2016/01/19
Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false], David Kastrup, 2016/01/10