[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Error from "make doc"
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: Error from "make doc" |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2016 10:52:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 |
Federico,
On 22/05/16 08:43, Federico Bruni wrote:
I don't think so. It's supposed to work out-of-the-box in LilyDev, but
I forgot to include this package in LilyDev 4.1. See warning in the
release note:
https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/releases/tag/4.1
Il giorno dom 22 mag 2016 alle 3:54, John Gourlay
<address@hidden> ha scritto:
Thank you! Installing the package lmodern fixed the problem.
Shouldn’t this instruction be part of the Contributor’s Guide?
On May 20, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
wrote:
Il giorno ven 20 mag 2016 alle 5:10, John Gourlay
<address@hidden> ha scritto:
I’m trying to set up a new LilyDev development system after some
kind of VirtualBox error that trashed my old one. I’ve run “make”
successfully in my ~/lilypond-git/build directory, and lilypond
runs. When I run “make doc”, however, I get errors. One of the
messages from make directed me to look at a log file named
suffix-lyxml.dblatex.log. This file contains the following messages
about invalid fonts. Have I overlooked something in setting up my
system?
Install the package lmodern:
sudo apt-get install lmodern
Added to LilyDev only one month ago:
https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/commit/2d4ed72d0d0a5f1b73b71d80489524c624e5727f
I am confused here.
Had John not used LilyDev but followed the documented CG instructions
for whatever Linux distribution - had he had one already installed -
then he wouldn't have hit this issue I suspect, I say that as someone
who compiles doc most days on both Ubuntu and Fedora and have tested and
documented all the instructions for all the distributions listed in the
CG and on my own 'at home' Fedora install I don't see any 'modern' fonts
installed if I run the command:
fc-list | grep modern
(or 'grep lm')
I can also see that the XeteX package listed in Debian's repos shows
lmodern as 'recommended' however on my own system I have texlive-xetex
installed and yet I still don't see lmodern installed, so it must not be
a dep on Fedora either.
lmodern is not a req as far as I can tell.
So what is special about LilyDev?
--
--
James