[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gub failure
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Gub failure |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> Looks like this was the problem. I had to edit the file and push it
> to release/unstable since Gub always seems to pull its source files
> from there, so editing locally doesn't work. My normal course would
> be to push this change to staging once I've uploaded the new builds
> and docs. Does that seem OK in this case?
I think so. New builds and docs include a regtest build so I don't
think we have to fathom staging failures if you managed a build.
Particularly not for this change.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Gub failure, (continued)
- Re: Gub failure, Dan Eble, 2016/07/26
- Re: Gub failure, David Kastrup, 2016/07/26
- Re: Gub failure, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, Phil Holmes, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, David Kastrup, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, David Kastrup, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure, David Kastrup, 2016/07/27
- Re: Gub failure,
David Kastrup <=