[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vertical movement without anchors
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: vertical movement without anchors |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:24:22 +0200 (CEST) |
>> That looks like the anchor point _is_ making a difference and that
>> it is part of the skyline ultimately used for positioning in 2.18
>> (a skyline which fits beside the skyline of the opposing stem,
>> resulting in a tighter adjustment). However, I don't see this
>> observation explain the difference in behavior in the manual
>> example. Does \textLengthOn have anything to do with it?
>
> Attached images for 2.16 and 2.19 with and without textLengthOn,
> debug-skylines applied, anchor-point still colored.
The new behaviour is better IMHO, however, we have to adjust the
documentation. I suggest that we show something similar to Thomas's
example with the turquoise and cyan lines. It might also help to
change the reference point's vertical position by modifying the
padding.
Werner
- vertical movement without anchors, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Phil Holmes, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25