[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:50:12 +0100 |
2016-11-12 15:42 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> The main problem I remember was a coding problem. It did not like
>>> working with UTF-8 characters.
>>
>>
>> Do you mean the encoding-problem is responsible for the failed
>> markup-cyclic-reference.ly?
>
> Very unlikely.
>
>> Or for the stuck while doc-building?
>
> Possibly but also unlikely. I remembered straightforward errors when
> using files with UTF-8 characters in them (and there were a number).
> And the file for demonstrating &oe; and similar HTML characters turned
> out wrong. No error I think, just wrong.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
Just seen Antonio continued his work:
https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/
Here what he did:
https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/NOTES_2016-11-10.txt
He claims to get a successful
make doc
Will look into it more thoroughly later the day.
Cheers,
Harm
- guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14