Re: Lily version operators documentation

[Urs Liska]

Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
>
>Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM
>
>> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>
>>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I
>>> don't think the NR is suitable, other than to have them listed in
>A22.
>>> Similarly, they will also be listed in the IR under Scheme
>functions.
>> 
>> Are they listed there really?
>> I was of the impression that the ly:something functions defined in
>> Scheme are *not* documented anywhere.
>
>You're right.  I was misled by the title of A.22 - "Scheme functions".
>Having explored how this is generated it seems these are actually
>scheme-callable functions written in C++, if I understand it correctly.

Yes, these are the functions created by LY_DEFINE in C++ files.

If I recall correctly there was discussion about auto-documenting "real" Scheme 
functions too, but I don't know where this went ...

Urs

>
>Trevor

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.