Re: Releasing 2.20

[Paul]

On 06/08/2017 03:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:

> > Sounds good to me.  I have a few things I'd like to get into the
> > stable release, one way or another, if possible.
> >
> > - Some CSS edits for the docs that I started but havent
> > finished/submitted for review yet.  I'll try to get that done in the
> > next few days if I can.
> Shouldn't matter a lot regarding stable/unstable but we should get the
> bikeshedding finished by release time.

Sounds good.

> > - Might be worth looking again at issue 3884, either to just go with
> > the initial patch for now, or try for one of the other approaches in
> > that discussion?
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3884/
> Ugh, looks like another ball I dropped.  I'll take to pencil and paper
> some time tomorrow.

I see you already have a proposal/fix.  That was fast!  I'll try to take 
a look and reply in the other thread.

> > - This doesn't really matter, but it might be worth renaming the
> > "staffLineLayoutFunction" context property (which is not really about
> > staff lines...) to something better, maybe
> > "pitchToStaffPositionFunction" or pitchToStaffPositionProcedure"? (It
> > takes a pitch and returns an integer indicating a vertical staff
> > position.  It's used in note-heads-engraver.cc)
> Well, discussion needs to have converged really well for changes to
> preexisting conventions to get into stable: we don't really want to do
> gratuitous changes that might get changed again or do not provide a
> definite payback for the hassle.

OK, sounds like a discussion to have for 2.21 / 2.22 then.

A few other possibilities, for later:

  pitchToStaffLayoutFunction

  pitchToStaffLayoutProcedure

  staffPitchLayoutFunction

  staffPitchLayoutProcedure

Cheers,
-Paul