[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden)
From: |
pkx166h |
Subject: |
Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:03:31 -0700 |
On 2017/09/24 18:02:11, benko.pal wrote:
Hello James,
> I took a bit of time to educate myself with Ancient notation and
have,
> hopefully, picked the correct note styles now.
>
> Should I use the red 4-line-staff for the rest of the examples or
just
> for the Gregorian clefs?
Just for the Gregorian clefs. Mensural clefs, as the C-clefs witness,
assume five line staves.
> https://cloud.woelkli.com/s/dBGXat0NEGVoy5C
The modified link is almost perfect, just two nits to pick:
- hufnagel-do-fa is misaligned (both the c and f should be on line, as
if hufnagel-do3-fa1) -- this may be a bug elsewhere.
Well I wonder if it is because I used 4 lines - I have now used, as per
Werner's suggestion, used 5 lines. See if this works.
- petrucci-f5 is duplicated.
Oh yes. Fixed. Thanks.
Thanks,
Pal
https://codereview.appspot.com/324420043/
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2017/09/12
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2017/09/24
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2017/09/24
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2017/09/24
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), lilyfan, 2017/09/24
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2017/09/24
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden),
pkx166h <=
- Re: NR: Update Clef styles Appendix (issue 324420043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2017/09/24