[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: add dynamic n for “niente” to feta (issue 339090043 by address@hidde
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: add dynamic n for “niente” to feta (issue 339090043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 09:01:47 -0800 |
As I don’t really know what I’m doing here, please have a closer look …
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps
File ps/encodingdefs.ps (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode721
ps/encodingdefs.ps:721: /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef
Should one remove one of these /.notdef entries to compensate the
addition of /n in line 679?
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode722
ps/encodingdefs.ps:722: % 0xf6
Of course this comment should be adjusted if none of the entries is
removed.
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode860
ps/encodingdefs.ps:860: /nine {<7c> show} def
I assume that all entries in this block are sorted alphabetically so /n
has to get index 7b and all following have to be shifted, right?
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode863
ps/encodingdefs.ps:863: % 0x78
What’s this? These comments look as if they refer to indexes but they
are offset …
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/
- Re: add dynamic n for “niente” to feta (issue 339090043 by address@hidden),
lilypond <=