Re: compilation with clang

[David Kastrup]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Looking around in the internet it seems that this is a real
>>> problem, violating the C++11 standard, cf.
>>>
>>>   
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33872039/invalid-explicitly-specified-argument-in-clang-but-successful-compilation-in-gcc
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I'm completely stuck with a fix – my C++ knowledge
>>> is simply too limited.  Anyone here who could help?
>> 
>> I thought that they had fixed this.
>
> Well, the comments in the above link say that the stackexchange
> example is buggy and that there isn't a bug in clang, cf.
>
>   https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25693
>
>> Rewriting this in a manner not relying on the C++11 (and earlier
>> IIRC) resolution rules is not all that feasible: this is really
>> heavily making use of it.  You'd have to do the whole method finding
>> business in a completely different manner.
>
> Are you *sure* that lilypond's code conforms to C++11?

I had read the standard on this after the first report.  It was pretty
clear I thought.  We had a discussion then.  I think that Mojca reported
it then, maybe you can look this up.

> Could you extract a MWE so that I can create a question on
> stackexchange?

What would that be good for?

-- 
David Kastrup