Re: guilev1/2 musing

[Karlin High]

On 1/24/2019 2:29 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley<address@hidden>  writes:
> > In other posts you wrote about the possibility we could fork guilev1.
> > Do you see any way to implement full Unicode support in such a fork of
> > our own and in a saner way than current guilev2?

> If we had that amount of manpower, that work would likely be better
> implemented in fixing Guile2.

Interesting discussion, even though I have little competence in these 
topics. I appreciate the dispassionate overview of LilyPond's relations 
to the Guile project.

Work has been done towards having LilyPond able to use Guile2. Any 
comments on the value of continuing those efforts?
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA