Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden)

[dak]

On 2019/02/08 12:45:43, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 2019/02/08 11:51:37, dak wrote:
> > Frankly, I don't like it.  The relevant metric here is the user time
and it's
> > _increased_ in your benchmark (not that it's likely significant).

> Agreed.

> > Throwing code in that the compiler does not know about is
> > not likely to be much of an advantage.

> In that case, how about adding these as mere Scheme shortcuts?
> not-null?, in particular, would be quite useful.

For what?

https://codereview.appspot.com/345190043/