Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "John Mandereau" <address@hidden>; "Lily devel" 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with 
stable/2.20 branch]


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> > To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: "John Mandereau" <address@hidden>; "Lily devel"
> > <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB
> > with stable/2.20 branch]
> >
> >
> > > "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> >
> > > > Not sure why it wants to change group to a non-existent entity.  Does
> > > > it copy the permissions (and memberships) to the remote server?
> > >
> > > Depends on what commands are used for copying.
> >
> >
> > I believe GUB upload uses rsync.
>
> Then it depends on the options used.  Some versions of rsync try to
> preserve group/owner.

It looks like the command is this from upload.py:

     cmds += ['rsync --delay-updates --progress %s %s'

% tup for tup in src_dests]

--
Phil Holmes