Re: Issue 5628: fix warnings compiling flower unit tests (issue 545320043 by address@hidden)

[nine . fierce . ballads]

On 2019/12/05 09:24:32, lemzwerg wrote:
> > I think we should actually pass in something to avoid
> > problems right away (-std=c++11 or =gnu++11 ?).

> Good idea.  In case you have time please try it, please check whether
it works.
> You have removed the biggest conformance obstacle already, so I don't
expect big
> difficulties.

I need to go back to the list archives to be sure, but my recollection
of the last time
we discussed this was that David asked us to wait until 2.20 was
released before
getting into it.

Also, when we move forward, I think we should go all the way to
requiring C++14,
because it smooths some rough edges of features that were introduced in
C++11.
I expressed this opinion before, but I don't think it generated a
discussion.

I don't think we should use GNU extensions if we can avoid it.


https://codereview.appspot.com/545320043/