[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release? |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Dec 2019 12:59:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
Am Freitag, den 06.12.2019, 22:45 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> writes:
> > Hi David,
> > Am Montag, den 18.11.2019, 18:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > Am Samstag, den 16.11.2019, 21:52 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > > Carl Sorensen <address@hidden
> > > >
> > > > > writes:Dear Team,
> > > > > It seems to me like we are pretty much in shape such that we
> > > > > shouldrelease 2.20. I'd be fine if we called 2.19.83-1 the 2.20
> > > > > release,even if there are some critical regressions. 2.19.83 is SO
> > > > > muchbetter than 2.18.2.
> > > > > IIUC, the only thing 2.20 is waiting on is for David K. to
> > > > > cherry-picksome patches. Is that correct?
> > > >
> > > > And putting out a new prerelease to be sure that those are ok,
> > > > andwaiting for the translators to catch up with cherry-picked
> > > > patchescontaining stuff to be translated.
> > > > But the current roadblock is David K. cherry-picking some patches.
> > > > Hereis a remaining list (not completely up to date with current
> > > > master,though not missing much) to check for possible inclusion
> > > > (assuming Ihave not overlooked something important pickable in the
> > > > sequencebefore). If you see something important here (or something not
> > > > incurrent master), put in a word for it.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the list of candidates, I processed around half of it fornow
> > > (+ some dependencies as mentioned below).All commits that I think should
> > > be "picked" are also readily availablein my branch
> > > origin/dev/hahnjo/stable-2.20. Let me know if those are okand I can
> > > easily push to stable/2.20.
> >
> > I've noticed that you picked a handful of commits to stable/2.20 lastweek.
> > Does it still make sense for me to maintain my branch (andcontinue going
> > through the list) if you're doing the work yourselfanyhow?
>
> I've worked from your list so far, checking the stuff individually,skipping
> over things that just were too rife in conflict and so on, andusing
> cherry-pick -x for keeping better track. I'm not yet through theannotated
> commit list you posted. I've been working with yourpreparatory work and its
> description but not with your branch.
> Does this help you deciding where to focus?
Ok, then I'll continue with the second half and post my findings once done.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part