[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics
From: |
Peter Toye |
Subject: |
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jan 2020 13:02:36 +0000 |
Thomas,
Thanks. CG chapter 2 starts off by saying that LilyDev has everything I should
need, but then only mentions how to install it under VirtualBox (which I don't
know at all) in Windows or MacOS. I'm a Linux newbie and haven't used Unix
since about 2000 (on a Sun box), so it's all a bit of a learning curve.
Should I be looking at lily-git instead? I'm not an experienced git user, and
it's beginning to look as if a minor change to three text files is going to end
up with me being swamped in new software :)
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:address@hidden
www.ptoye.com
-------------------------
Saturday, January 4, 2020, 12:10:23 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Am Sa., 4. Jan. 2020 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Peter
> Toye <address@hidden>:
>> Yes, I'm on Windows, but have just resurrected an old laptop and have
>> managed to get a Linux (antiX) system on it. And there's a spare partition
>> to install LilyDev. I'll download it today.
> Well, if you have a LINUX-machine, you may consider not to install
> LilyDev at all, i.e. clone the git-repo directly.
> LilyDev is meant to be used by windows users in a VirtualBox on their
> windows-system.
> It comes along with some other preinstalled things you will want.
> If you don't use LilyDev you'll need to get those stuff yourself.
> Otoh, going for LilyDev has it's own hassles.
> Your decision.
> Speaking only for me, I started with LilyDev,
> although being on LINUX.
> After some time I switched to my host-system for any LilyPond-work.
> Though I kept all old and outdated LilyDevs, to keep the possibility
> to compile checkouts of old patches for research-purposes.
> Using old versions of gcc, ghostscript etc
> I doubt you'll need that.
> Cheers,
> Harm
- A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics,
Peter Toye <=
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Malte Meyn, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, David Kastrup, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05