[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics
From: |
Peter Toye |
Subject: |
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:17:34 +0000 |
Sunday, January 5, 2020, 5:11:16 PM, you wrote:
> On 05/01/20 13:20, Peter Toye wrote:
> Any particular reason you're systemd-free?
> Okay, my pc is, also, but I
> run gentoo which defaults to OpenRC.
I decided to go for antiX as I was able to get it to install on my antique
laptop, which Ubuntu won't - diesn't have the right driver for the graphics
card. And they don't like systemd.
> Most distros are systemd these days, it's much
> simpler and more reliable
> than SysVInit, and the people who are so vocal
> against it seem mostly to
> be in the "fanatic" category - "I don't like it so you should do the
> work so I don't have to use it". Sorry, linux doesn't work like that!
I'm not knowledgeable enough to know whether the antiX team are fanatics or
not. And I don't want to get into a flame war, thanks.
> Linux is only "free" as in "freedom" - if you want something you have
> to pay for it one way or another. If you
> want "\rf" then you do it
> yourself or you get someone to do it for you -
> and if you do the latter
> then whether in money or kind you're expected to pay.
I was engraving some 19th century music which uses rf throughout, and was
surprised not to find it built into LilyPond. I created a custom dynamic
without difficulty (and several others which aren't built in). It's simply that
I thought that adding \rf to the list of "normal" LP dynamics so that it would
be useful. The reason I'm installing Linux (which I've not used before) and all
the rest is so that I can help the community. I don't expect anything - apart
possibly from some advice - for free, and I don't know why you should think I
do.
> Anyways, I'll give you a little tip, and attach my "dynamics.ily" file.
> All my custom dynamics live in here, and I
> include it in any work that
> might need them. I'm *guessing* that it's very similar to the standard
> definitions that exist in lilypond, so all you will need to do is edit
> the standard file and they'll appear by magic.
> Only snag, if you modify
> your local version of lilypond, they'll
> disappear with any upgrade :-(
Thanks - I've got a similar one with a different selection!
> Cheers,
> Wol
Best regards,
Peter
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, (continued)
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Malte Meyn, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, David Kastrup, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics,
Peter Toye <=
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/06
- How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Federico Bruni, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Dan Eble, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Malte Meyn, 2020/01/04