[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: macOS 64-bit
From: |
Marnen Laibow-Koser |
Subject: |
Re: macOS 64-bit |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:04:35 -0500 |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 01:07 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > There is one lingering problem: when LilyPond calls Guile, Guile is
> > > > not finding the library files specified in load-extension
> > > > expressions, even though they *should* be in the right place.
> > > > Before I go too crazy searching, does anyone know what controls this
> > > > path choice? I'm assuming it may be a compilation option for the
> > > > LilyPond binary, but I really don't know.
> > >
> > > Here's a link to the script MacPorts is using to call lilypond.
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/textproc/lilypond-devel/files/lilypond.in
> > >
> > > It seems you have to set LDTL_LIBRARY_PATH.
> >
> > I saw that, of course, but I’m not sure what that variable even is. In
> particular, I have no reason to believe that it affects Guile’s load
> path...but I’ll try it and see. Thanks for the reminder.
> >
> > I *think* that the Guile load path is the last issue standing between me
> and a self-contained 64-bit Mac .app bundle. Everything else appears to be
> working.
>
> From my experiments, this is where LilyPond's relocation kicks in. I
> think you have to provide .reloc files in etc/relocation, that's also
> what GUB does.
Yup, I copied those over from the GUB-built bundle. I'm not quite sure how
they work, but it looks like the LilyPond executable looks for them on
startup, right?
Unfortunately, I don't quite see how to set the right path in those: an
.app bundle is movable, and while the Mac OS path resolver has a special
notation (@executable_path) for the path of the executable within that
bundle, it doesn't seem to put it into an environment variable in any
useful way. I tried @executable_path in those pathnames, but it didn't
*seem* to work; OTOH, it changed enough behavior that further research may
be worth while.
I should say here that I don't know that much about Mac application
packaging; I'm doing this mostly because no one else seemed interested to
do it and I really want a 64-bit build.
> It allows to dynamically set environment variables, in
> this case GUILE_LOAD_PATH.
> To point you to the next error in advance: You have to do the same for
> Fontconfig or it can't find its config file 😉
>
Ah, thanks for the warning. At this point I think it's all about
path-munging.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Jonas
>
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
address@hidden
http://www.marnen.org
- Re: macOS 64-bit, (continued)
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/09
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/09
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/09
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/09
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/09
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit,
Marnen Laibow-Koser <=
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/10
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Dan Eble, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Dan Eble, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/11