Re: github mirror of lilypond?

[David Kastrup]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Han-Wen has recently pushed a bunch of changes directly to
>>> Rietveld, most of them quite uncontroversial.  I assume that this
>>> is as good as an e-mail :-)
>>>
>>> I thus suggest that after his patches have been reviewed,
>> 
>> How are they going to get reviewed when there is nothing pointing to
>> them?  How would anyone including Han-Wen know when the review phase
>> ends?
>
> Well, as has been pointed out, pull requests at github don't have
> 'review phases', and what we have here is comparable IMHO.
>
> One developer (or maybe two, just to be sure) acknowledges the patch,
> and that's it.  Kind of a highway solution for trivial things.

Trivial things from a developer with push access can be just pushed.
Complex or otherwise contential things warrant a chance for developers
to take a look at it.  "Half a chance" seems an unnecessary
complication.

-- 
David Kastrup