Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 9 July

[Owen Lamb]

Hi Werner,
> * Regarding `noteheads.uM2`, I don't see a problem with removing the
>    hard-coded stems.

That's good to hear. If we do, though, we'll have to reconcile 
breve/longa sidebars with Lily's customizable stems. I'm thinking we 
keep our breve glyphs for SMuFL compatibility, but in LP itself we draw 
breves and longas as noteheads.s0 with primitive sidebars. If folks want 
to use a specific breve glyph (i.e. if a breve's sidebars have a certain 
style the user doesn't want to part with), we make that a settable option.

For now, unless anyone wants to take that up themselves, I'll just mark 
it to be done later and keep moving along with the name mapping.

> * I think that the five Bravura glyphs can all be aliases for
>    `noteheads.s2xcircle`.  The differences are really marginal, AFAICS.

Good point. They look kinda different when you zoom in, but considering 
noteheads.s2xcircle is used for every note value anyway, it just makes 
sense.

Owen