[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snippet fails with 2.23.
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: snippet fails with 2.23. |
Date: |
Tue, 17 May 2022 20:39:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 |
Le 16/05/2022 à 23:07, Thomas Morley a écrit :Well, I _am_ a LSR-editor.
Though, sometimes it feels I am the only one (not really true, Werner
does a lot but his focus is more on lsr-software and
snippets-descriptions).
We really need more active LSR-editors.
This sounds like an advocacy problem, really. To give an outsider's
point of view, until this message I had no idea who was behind
the LSR approval process apart from you, and I wasn't aware that
you wished help. I still only have a vague idea of what kind of
work this entails. And I am following this list and the user list
closely for two years or so. If more volunteers are needed, I recommend
(1) documenting what work they should do and how, and (2) asking
for volunteers on the user list.
(Please note that I am not proposing myself, I'm already busy
enough contributing to LilyPond.)
Jean
- snippet fails with 2.23., Thomas Morley, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., David Kastrup, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Jean Abou Samra, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Thomas Morley, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Thomas Morley, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., David Kastrup, 2022/05/15
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Mats Bengtsson, 2022/05/16
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Thomas Morley, 2022/05/16
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23.,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: snippet fails with 2.23., Thomas Morley, 2022/05/17