[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile 3.0
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Guile 3.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2022 23:18:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Wol <antlists@youngman.org.uk> writes:
> On 23/05/2022 20:19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Vendoring Guile seems totally impractical. The Guile compilation does
>> some sort of bootstrapping, which makes building it from scratch
>> glacially slow (like: O(1 hour)), so it would be impossible for day to
>> day development work.
>
> Just an idea, if "current" Guile has issues - could you just vendor
> Guile in the stable release?
Well, Guile upstream has a strange notion of what "stable release" is
supposed to mean, so in effect one would have to create one's own
"stable release" and cherry-pick actual fixes instead of the entirety of
what is stable more in the Augeas sense.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Guile 3.0, (continued)
- Re: Guile 3.0, David Kastrup, 2022/05/22
- Re: Guile 3.0, Luca Fascione, 2022/05/22
- Re: Guile 3.0, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2022/05/22
- Re: Guile 3.0, Luca Fascione, 2022/05/22
- Re: Guile 3.0, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0, Luca Fascione, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0, Luca Fascione, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0, Wol, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/05/23
- Re: Guile 3.0,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Thinking about the next stable release, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2022/05/22
Re: Thinking about the next stable release, Dan Eble, 2022/05/22
Re: Thinking about the next stable release, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/05/26