[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC on MR 1368
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: RFC on MR 1368 |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2022 08:02:10 +0200 |
I have had many similarly exhausting discussions before, so I
empathize (it is also the reason that I paused my contributions
recently.)
I would go with Werner's choices here; as the Freetype author, he is
the expert on font features and technology.
>From the MR:
> I equally object to any contribution being merged "because the author knows
> what he's doing".
I object to reviewers blocking contributions just because they have a
strong opinion on how things should be done. In this case, Jonas has
made 0 contributions to the MF code, so I don't think his concerns
should be overriding.
If Jonas feels really strongly about how the kerning should be
handled, I invite him to teach himself the joys of Metafont and try
his hand at a follow-up MR.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:01 AM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> Folks,
>
>
> Jonas and I have an intense (and very exhausting) discussion where to
> add kerning data. I want to hear more opinions whether I should go
> 'route one' (which I prefer) or 'route two' (which Jonas prefers).
>
> Please have a look at MR 1368
>
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1368
>
> and chime in.
>
>
> Werner
>
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen