Re: wishlist

[David Rogers]

On 2004/01/30, J. Daniel Ashton wrote:


>Still, my gut says that there should be individual glyphs for these
>common markings, to make them as perfect as our noteheads and stems,
>sharps, flats, etc.

I disagree with this idea. If only a few of the most common word-like
markings get separate glyphs, then all other such markings will look
out-of-place.

If it's possible to create/modify a font in order to improve ALL
possible word-like markings, that would make sense. Otherwise better
left as is.

David