lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: print change of clef after barline


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: print change of clef after barline
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:26:28 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> 2014-06-01 12:19 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
>> 2014-06-01 12:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> make-vector
>>>
>>>> @David
>>>> If an experienced user like Damian stumbles across it, it might be
>>>> worth clearifying it in NR/IR.
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> I don't think that we can reasonably explain stuff like make-vector in
>>> our manuals.
>>>
>>> The best we can do is to avoid it in elementary examples.  That may mean
>>> spelling three identical lists out, or using
>>> (let ((breaklst ...)) (vector breaklst breaklst breaklst))
>>>
>>> It's probably most straightforward to spell the lists out three times.
>>> That leaves the user with a tedious but reliable and easy to understand
>>> recipe.
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Kastrup
>>
>> Agreed.
>> I'll go for a patch.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Harm
>
>
> Well, I have a problem:
>
> I assume the entries in
> IR 3.1.22 BreakAlignment ->break-align-orders
> Or NR A.17 Layout properties ->break-align-orders
> are generated from define-grob-properties.scm
> Correct?

Values from define-grobs.scm.

> We have already:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/snippets/pitches#pitches-separating-key-cancellations-from-key-signature-changes
>
> Therefore I think refering to that snippet would be sufficient.
> Is it feasible to reference it from inside define-grob-properties.scm
> If yes, how to do it?

Judging from other manual entries, by putting the following at the end
of the documentation string:

@snippets

@lilypondfile[verbatim,quote,ragged-right,texidoc,doctitle]
{separating-key-cancellations-from-key-signature-changes.ly}

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]