lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

{g,, g'' g g}


From: Gianmaria Lari
Subject: {g,, g'' g g}
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:46:05 -0700 (MST)

I wonder if there is better and more coincise way to write the following
"scale":

musict = {
  g16 g'' g g  a,, a'' a a  b,, b'' b b  c,, c'' c c 
  d,, d'' d d  e,, e'' e e  fis,, fis'' fis fis  g,, g'' g g
  
  a,, a'' a a  b,, b'' b b  c,, c'' c c d,, d'' d d  
  e,, e'' e e  fis,, fis'' fis fis  g,, g'' g g  g,, g'' g g
  
  fis,, fis'' fis fis  e,, e'' e e  d,, d'' d d  c,, c'' c c 
  b,, b'' b b  a,, a'' a a  g,, g'' g g  fis,, fis'' fis fis
  
  e,, e'' e e  d,, d'' d d  c,, c'' c c b,, b'' b b  a,, a'' a a  g,, g'' g
g  
}

Thank you, g.

P.S. A possible patter couldn be {g,, g'' g g} repeated increasing the
pitch.




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/g-g-g-g-tp177750.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]