[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
{g,, g'' g g}
From: |
Gianmaria Lari |
Subject: |
{g,, g'' g g} |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:46:05 -0700 (MST) |
I wonder if there is better and more coincise way to write the following
"scale":
musict = {
g16 g'' g g a,, a'' a a b,, b'' b b c,, c'' c c
d,, d'' d d e,, e'' e e fis,, fis'' fis fis g,, g'' g g
a,, a'' a a b,, b'' b b c,, c'' c c d,, d'' d d
e,, e'' e e fis,, fis'' fis fis g,, g'' g g g,, g'' g g
fis,, fis'' fis fis e,, e'' e e d,, d'' d d c,, c'' c c
b,, b'' b b a,, a'' a a g,, g'' g g fis,, fis'' fis fis
e,, e'' e e d,, d'' d d c,, c'' c c b,, b'' b b a,, a'' a a g,, g'' g
g
}
Thank you, g.
P.S. A possible patter couldn be {g,, g'' g g} repeated increasing the
pitch.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/g-g-g-g-tp177750.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- {g,, g'' g g},
Gianmaria Lari <=
- Re: {g,, g'' g g}, Klaus Blum, 2015/06/12
- Re: {g,, g'' g g}, David Kastrup, 2015/06/12
- Re: {g,, g'' g g}, Simon Albrecht, 2015/06/12
- Re: {g,, g'' g g}, Klaus Blum, 2015/06/12
- Re: {g,, g'' g g}, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/06/12