[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:30:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 12/09/15 13:24, David Kastrup wrote:
> Depends on the composer's date of death and whether you are transcribing
> editorial annotations as well or just sticking to the Urtext. "we were
> given photocopy music sheet" does not exactly sound a lot more legal
> either, though I have indeed (from Hohner Verlag) received "original
> sheet music" that was a really lousy quality loose sheet photocopy with
> an "original music, do not photocopy" stamp mark placed on it.
Dunno how it works elsewhere, but in the UK, if you pay the copyright
fees you get a stamp that you can place, in red ink, a "property of X"
statement that says copyright has been paid on the photocopy so it's legit.
So a lot of our copies have that stamp for some other band in black :-)
Cheers,
Wol
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, (continued)
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, William Marchant, 2015/09/11
Fwd: Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Urs Liska, 2015/09/12
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, MING TSANG, 2015/09/12
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, David Sumbler, 2015/09/12
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Stan Sanderson, 2015/09/12
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Peter Gentry, 2015/09/13
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2015/09/13
Re:OT: Beauty of programming languages, Leszek WroĊski, 2015/09/14