Re: Poor man's ossia, continued

[Jacques Menu]

Hello Malte,

Thanks for you answer.

> Le 15 sept. 2015 à 12:26, Malte Meyn <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> Am 15.09.2015 um 10:26 schrieb Menu Jacques:
>> Hello folks,
>> 
>> Trying to define a function using the solution provided by this list, I bump
>> into the following:
>> - I have to use \relative before \poorMansOssia, otherwise the music in the
>> "ossia" is taken into account to determine the following note’s octave;
> That’s how relative works: Lily doesn’t automatically start a new “relative 
> block” for new voices. IMO that’s good because it’s easier to find out the 
> pitch of the last entered note than that one of the last note in the current 
> voice.

OK.

>> - there’s a missing bar in the first staff, can’t find where to put the « | 
>> » to
>> get it;
> No, there isn’t. There are only notes for two bars. Did you mean a bar 
> *line*? Then | won’t set a bar line but complain when you place it somewhere 
> and there shouldn’t be a bar line. You might want to use one of the \bar (for 
> a line in mid-measure) or \partial (for a shorter measure) commands or 
> override measureLength or measurePosition (dito).

Ooops, really getting old… thought there were two bars where there’s only one!

>> - the "ossia" in the second staff is offset to the right, while it isn’t in 
>> the
>> first one.
> This happens because the NoteHeads are aligned, even when they are hidden. 
> You can try to override the NoteHead’s stem-attachment or the Stem’s and 
> Beam’s extra-offset but I don’t know how to find the exact values.

Fine, I’ll look into that.

JM.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user