Re: Time signature denominator as a note rather than number?

[Malte Meyn]

Am 16.09.2015 um 11:07 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Am 16.09.2015 um 05:02 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> > > Have a look at this LSR snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=642
>
>     (let* ((frac (ly:grob-property grob 'fraction))
>            (num (if (pair? frac) (car frac) 4))
>            (den (if (pair? frac) (cdr frac) 4))

I copied these lines from the snippet but I don’t know any case where 
defaulting to 4/4 would be necessary; 'fraction exists even if there is 
no explicite time signature. (So
;;
  (num (car frac))
  (den (cdr frac))
;;
should suffice.)

>                     #:override '(style . default)

I also have no idea what this is and why it should be necessary …

Probably important is the used lilypond version; I use 2.19.27.