|
From: | 70147persson |
Subject: | Chords and what they mean |
Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:27:36 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
It is about chords, a few of them. It started when I should clean write a score from a manuscript. In one measure there were noted two chords, C5 and C. Obviously not the same, as they stood just beside of each other. A search on Wikipedia also told me, and this was also confirmed, the author's intention, that C5 means C(no 3), hence <c g>, while the chord C means <c e g>. But LilyPond treats these two the same and produces the same notes. This is also clearly said e.g. in Appendices A.1 and A.2 of Notation Reference, as well as in the text part. However even if possibly a correct procedure, is it a correct practise?
Another such discrepancy is about Csus, which Wikipedia (and my friends) says is equivalent to Csus4, hence <c f g>. But LilyPond produces <c g>, hence what should come from the notation C5 as in the previous paragraph.
So, what is the truth? Kaj
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |