[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Violin notation advice requested
From: |
Michael Gerdau |
Subject: |
Re: Violin notation advice requested |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:14:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) |
> No, both are fingerings. The upper fingering is the recommended version
> for best phrasing and distribution across strings, the lower fingering
> is the simpler version mainly in first position (not sure whether the I
> is supposed to indicate position or the E string, I think the latter),
> only escaping to third position where first position is clearly
> insufficient.
I agree with all of the above except that I'm pretty sure the roman
number indicates position and not string number. I've never seen a
violin fingering indicating the string. Stating the position and the
finger does denote the string indirectly and every violist I know
would immediately be able to tell the string :)
AFAIA only guitarists (and possibly bass players) think about their
strings in numbers :)
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Michael Gerdau email: address@hidden
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.