[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 19:18:49 +0200 (CEST) |
> I just said that because often Elaine Gould is used as kind of a bible
> and as normative reference, whereas a notable part of her statements
> are personal suggestions and a matter of style or preference. She’s
> just the only one who has made a comprehensive publication on the
> topic (with Stone and Gardner/Read already being more specific, IIUC),
> but the opinions of the master engravers of (chiefly, amongst others)
> Peters and Breitkopf of the ‘golden age’ of hand-engraving music are
> at least equally valuable.
What about Helene Wanske's »Musiknotation« book?
Werner
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, (continued)
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Wols Lists, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Andrew Bernard, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Brian Barker, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Brian Barker, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, David Wright, 2015/09/26
- Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, David Kastrup, 2015/09/26
Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off, Andrew Bernard, 2015/09/26