Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

[zzk]

Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I
> took
> a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
> mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
> them macros.
> 
> I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace or M-x replace-string to the
> sublime text approach of multiple selection.

I agree with your point that emacs' replace capabilities look more powerful.
However, at this stage, it would be an overkill for me, as I am not a heavy
text editor user. 

I guess, it is great that we have so many options today (with a number of
open source apps). 

Zoran



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183312.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.