|
From: | Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: | Re: error handling |
Date: | Tue, 5 Jul 2022 01:20:24 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 |
On 7/5/22 01:10, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Di., 5. Juli 2022 um 00:34 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr>: I just detected I can't compile my code with 2.22. any more, due to the internal changes in \repeat volta. Ofcourse it could have been any other change as well. Should I code for both lily-versions, just to get helpful error messages? Well, no, thanks.We have a real problem here.You are a master of understatement.
I sense the long coding day behind this sentence ... :)
Does it help to use master, not byte-compiled?
Short answer: no. Slightly less short answer: what matters is the way LilyPond executes the code in the file, not the way it executes its internal code. Also, bytecode is precisely what gives you the error locations.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |