[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcont
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:46:56 +0000 |
On 7 Dec 2011, at 11:16, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> I have a question in this regard too. What it is the main reason we cannot
> have BSD-sockets when NO_SYS=1? I have ported LwIP to
> djgpp/OpenWatcom on MSDOS which lack a good implementation of
> pthreads.
Our sockets implementation requires separate threads - one for the stack (the
tcpip thread) and so another for the application. It doesn't fundamentally
have to be that way, but that's the way it is.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Kieran Mansley, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, junix, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/08