Re: [lwip-users] sys_arch_mbox_fetch() implementation for FreeRTOS

[massimiliano cialdi]

sorry,

my fault

best regards

Max

Massimiliano Cialdi

FIRMWARE ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL LEADER

Powersoft S.p.A.

Via E. Conti, 5 - Scandicci (Fi) 50018 - Italy

OFFICE:    +39 055 7350230

     

 

On 21/06/22 20:56, goldsimon@gmx.de wrote:

> Am
>       21.06.2022 um 12:37 schrieb massimiliano cialdi via lwip-users:
>       
> > hello,
> >         
> >         
> >         the setsockopt(SO_RCVTIMEO) POSIX call contemplates the
> >         possibility of
> >         
> >         imposing 0 as the 'timeout' parameter, and in that case that
> >         socket
> >         
> >         becomes non-blocking (See, for example,
> >         
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49706883/disable-socket-timeout-via-setsockopt).
> >         
> >       
>       
>       
>       Sorry, but stackoverflow is *not* a good source to cite when
>       talking
>       
>       about POSIX standard.
>       
>       
>       Instead, I prefer to search opengroup.com and on the 'setsockopt'
>       page
>       
>       google gives me
>       
> (https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/setsockopt.html),
>       
>       I find this in the description of SO_RCVTIMEO:
>       
>       
>       "The default for this option is zero, which indicates that a
>       receive
>       
>       operation shall not time out."
>       
>       
>       BTW, even the stackoverflow page you cited says: "If the timeout
>       is set
>       
>       to zero (the default) then the operation will never timeout".
>       
>       
>       Regards,
>       
>       Simon
>       
>       
>       _______________________________________________
>       
>       lwip-users mailing list
>       
>       lwip-users@nongnu.org
>       
>       https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>       
>