[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:26:27 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Echoing Nathan, this is a huge pain of an infrastructure task, and thank
> you for taking it on!
If you don't mind (I've obviously missed a chapter here), why was it
necessary to drop Redmine in favor of Trac?
(I'm currently in the process of choosing a bug-tracker for a
community-based project, that's why I'd like to know why Redmine isn't
a suitable option in a nutshell.)
Cheers,
Valentin.
- [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Will Kahn-Greene, 2012/01/23
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Nathan Yergler, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Christopher Allan Webber, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Valentin Villenave, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Valentin Villenave, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Christopher Allan Webber, 2012/01/24