[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
From: |
Joar Wandborg |
Subject: |
Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:12:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
My comment was regarding JavaScript in GNU MediaGoblin, if this is not
the discussion point, please find an appropriate channel for this
discussion and sorry for my confusion.
On 11/12/2013 08:07 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Some of you people love to label people dont you? First you label the first
> poster as "unjustified" and now I am trolling. Now that you have labeled me
> as a Troll perhaps people will dismiss me instead of pay attention to a
> potential problem with the code?
>
> Who are people supposed to trust first? LibreJS or some other organization?
> You guys can do what you want but I am going with LibreJS, if it tells me
> some code is blocked, there is a good reason for it. Have a nice day fellas.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Williamson [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:57 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
>
> Pretty sure you're trolling here, but this is the untrue statement: "If
>
> LibreJS is blocking something, it is likely non free." In fact, most of the
>
> free Javascript in the world will be blocked by LibreJS, because the
>
> license notation LibreJS requires is not yet widely used. So the only
>
> conclusion you can reasonably draw when LibreJS blocks some javascript is
>
> that the javascript does not contain the notation, not that the license is
>
> unfree.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:51:15 -0800, <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> That is not true? That the developers should test the code with LibreJS
>
>> before releasing it? If LibreJS has a defect, they should notify the
>
>> developers of LibreJS I would think. If LibreJS is fine, then the new
>
>> conventions should be followed. In the meantime, i would avoid taking
>
> the
>
>> survey.
>
>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: Joar Wandborg [mailto:address@hidden] On Behalf Of Joar
>
> Wandborg
>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:39 AM
>
>> To: address@hidden
>
>> Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript
>
>>
>
>> On 11/12/2013 07:33 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>>> Can the developer do their own testing with LibreJS to make sure
>
>> beforehand
>
>>> that their code will not be blocked? *If LibreJS is blocking
>
> something,
>
>> it
>
>>> is likely non free.*
>
>>
>
>> Regarding the above emphasized sentence: That is simply not true,
>
> LibreJS
>
>> requires some brand-new commenting conventions that previously have not
>
>> been
>
>> necessary to designate make a JavaScript file free.
>
>>
>
>> All of our JavaScript and code is released under OSI-approved licenses,
>
>> LibreJS is simply not clever enough to detect it at the moment.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>> devel mailing list
>
>> address@hidden
>
>> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, (continued)
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, Aaron Williamson, 2013/11/12
- Message not available
- [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, cgw993, 2013/11/12
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, Laura Arjona, 2013/11/12
- Message not available
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, cgw993, 2013/11/12
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript, ayleph, 2013/11/12
- Re: [GMG-Devel] Survey requires nonfree Javascript,
Joar Wandborg <=