[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] snipping almost twenty lines out of the commenting code
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] snipping almost twenty lines out of the commenting code |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 14:06, Mike Scalora wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Benno Schulenberg
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Thinking about it, a better way to prevent the unwanted undo item
> > presented itself. It even gets rid of the file_changed bool. See the
> > first patch again.
>
> That's better.
Attached is a further revised version.
> I'm neck deep in indent code right now,
Nice. I have already rebound my keys in anticipation:
# Indenting and Outdenting:
bind M-I indent main
bind M-O unindent main
bind M-J autoindent main
# Kommenting:
bind M-K comment main
> just last
> night I was thinking that tabsize should be a per-file variable.
Hm? Why would you want that?
> > [...] it's too much work to pass the data.
>
> Would it be heresy to suggest a variadic function?
Yes. :) Too heavy for just one special case.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be
0001-text-add-an-undo-item-before-starting-to-comment-or-.patch
Description: Text Data