[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should error messages get colored differently? and
From: |
David Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should error messages get colored differently? and in red by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 02:17:48 -0600 |
Brand Huntsman:
> Adding A_BLINK with A_REVERSE or a black background causes the black
> to brighten, ending up with the unreadable "bold,black,red" issue.
That is a problem, then.
Since non-black blinking text on a black background works perfectly well
here, and we're talking about the statusbar... is there a typo in that
statement, so "A_BLINK with A_REVERSE *on* a black background" is what
causes the problem? Or am I misunderstanding something?
> I don't think nano should default to A_BLINK for anyone. Non-color
> users will still have a working statusbar, but we have no idea how
> their terminal might react to A_BLINK.
Point.
> We could add a blink attribute to the color code: set errorcolor
> "blink,bold,reverse,red,black"
> # blink bold black text on bright red
This sounds good, then.