[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63992] nchoosek has suboptimal performance

[John W. Eaton]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #63992 (project octave):

I understand and appreciate the desire to make Octave faster but I don't see a
need for every function to be rewritten in C++ just to gain a bit of speed,
nor do I see any need to rush to committing a C++ version of nchoosek (or any
other function) just for performance reasons.

Are there bugs in nchoosek that cause incorrect results beyond any expected
limitations due to limited precision?



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63992>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/