|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #43742] ifft, ifft2, ifftn should accept 'nonsymmetric' and 'symmetric' options |
Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:43:35 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #43742 (project octave): I'm not sure if it makes sense to implement this flag in the way proposes here. Instead, it would probably be better to setup FFTW to use a planner from the function `fftw_plan_many_dft_c2r` [1] or `fftw_plan_many_r2r` [2]. That should be done in liboctave probably around here: https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/774c54278e97/liboctave/numeric/oct-fftw.cc#l247 [1]: https://www.fftw.org/fftw3_doc/Advanced-Real_002ddata-DFTs.html [2]: https://www.fftw.org/fftw3_doc/Advanced-Real_002dto_002dreal-Transforms.html _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43742> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |