[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64801] besselj(1, z) is not pure imaginary for pure imaginary inputs

[Nicholas Jankowski]

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #64801 (project octave):

Thanks for confirming.  I don’t know much about the library itself, but the
fact that the error for one thing that should be identically zero grows as it
does is a bit concerning.  There is a compatibility interest to determining if
there’s a reasonable way to independently address the accuracy of the two
parts.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64801>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/