[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:32:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060817) |
David Bateman wrote:
> Sorry I had no network connection last night so couldn't send this. Here
> is an updated patch, based on the changes discussed. You might prefer
> the mark Flasterr extern in error.h rather than in cellfun.cc.
>
> D.
>
>
John,
Can I commit the changes to cellfun.cc there were attached to my
previous message in this thread?
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/03
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/05
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/07
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays,
David Bateman <=
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/12
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/12