[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: move constructors likely a requirement
From: |
ederag |
Subject: |
Re: move constructors likely a requirement |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:02:18 +0200 |
On vendredi 30 août 2019 03:43:52 CEST John W. Eaton wrote:
> This experience does show that we need some kind of performance testing,
> and not just an aggregate time required to running the test suite. We
> need a set of tests to check performance of specific features. But I'm
> not sure how best to do comparisons. What do we use for baseline values?
benchmark2 could help with micro-benchmarking:
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9631
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, (continued)
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Rik, 2019/08/23
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, John W. Eaton, 2019/08/23
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/08/23
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/08/23
- Re: Longitudinal Octave Performance, Rik, 2019/08/24
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Rik, 2019/08/24
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Lars Winterfeld, 2019/08/26
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, John W. Eaton, 2019/08/29
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Rik, 2019/08/30
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement, Daniel J Sebald, 2019/08/30
- Re: move constructors likely a requirement,
ederag <=