[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: 'Old' Pan for PCLinuxOS?
From: |
Glenn |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: 'Old' Pan for PCLinuxOS? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:41:36 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 06:38:03 Glenn wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2008 12:07:01 Maurice wrote:
> > On Friday 15 February 2008 18:23:15 Duncan wrote:
> > > Interesting. So all you needed was an rpm handler? I thought
> > > pclinuxos was based on mandr(ake|iva), and thus rpm based already, and
> > > that it followed that it had rpm handling built-in? Is that incorrect?
> >
> > Not really. It does have RPM, but for some reason 'rpm -i <package>'
> > caused "Cannot obtain lock" errors. Nothing to do with dependencies.
> >
> > Mandriva has URPMI. PCLinuxOS has KPackage (which hooks into
> > Konqueror).
>
> Actually, PCLinuxOS uses Synaptic as the GUI for the RPMs, which would have
> taken care of the dependencies for you, no problem. And, so far as the
> Mandriva-ness of it is concerned, it's steadily drifted from that over the
> last several major releases.
Oops. Just remembered that you were speaking of Old-Pan. That's not in the
repositories, hence the problems. For normally resident programs in the
repositories, Synaptic _would_ have been the correct answer to the question.
In your case, that wasn't a viable path. Sorry for the noise.
--
06:39:49 up 5 days, 23:56, running PCLinuxOS release 2007 (PCLinuxOS) for
i586, kernel 2.6.18.8.tex5
Registered Linux user #324360
address@hidden Team: Ex-Zoomies (31839)
People usually get what's coming to them ... unless it's been mailed.