[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?
From: |
Daniel Rahn |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet? |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:36:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 29 March 2008 22:00:35 Duncan wrote:
> Wouldn't this be a pan implementation, not external, so therefore
> should be quotes not angle-brackets? Like so (and is the relative
> path still correct in that case?):
>
> + #include "pan/general/glib-compat.h"
If you do it this way, the relative path is incorrect. You'd end up
with something like this:
#include "../../glib-compat.h"
And that's really ugly ...
> Otherwise, when upgrading it's likely to try to use the existing
> "system" header file instead of the new one in the upgrade, since it
> believes it to be part of system, not internal to the package being
> compiled, right?
That can happen if you get some variable setting wrong, ie. if the $PWD
the package is built in is not placed before any system files.
If that happens, you will not be able to compile PAN anyway, since the
patch I provided sticks to the coding style that Charles introduced,
ie. it is done this way for other includes already.
-Daniel
PS: So I assume you did not try the patch so far ;)
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?,
Daniel Rahn <=
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/31
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/31
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, walt, 2008/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Beso, 2008/03/30
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Keith Richie, 2008/03/30
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Beso, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/31